Definitions
by Barry Carter
Since David Hudson first spoke of the materials that he rediscovered
people have been trying to come up with ways to define them. Hudson
called these materials "ORME" or "ORMUS(R) and he claimed that they were
the same as the biblical manna and showbread. He referred to them as
the "white powder of gold" and the "Philosopher's Stone" but some of
these terms were clearly used as subcategories of ORME, the generic
name that he used in his patent.
Some people have attempted to redefine these terms in such a way as to
imply that some subcategories of the material that Hudson described are
inferior to other subcategories. It appears that they may have done
this to try to enhance the value of their own product while diminishing
the value of the products of others.
I believe that the following definition is the most appropriate at this
time:
ORME, ormus and m-state all are
generic terms which apply to any normally metallic elements in a
spectroscopically "invisible" non-metallic form. These terms apply
regardless of which method was used to obtain them or the relative
effectiveness of the element.
I think we should take a clue from the people who originated these
terms when defining them. In his first Dallas lecture David Hudson
equated the terms ORME and ormus:
"Now if that isn't heavy enough
for you, when I found out that the name for the golden tree of life was
the ORME, ormus or ormes."
He made this equivalence even more evident in other lectures which have
not been transcribed. In a couple of these lectures he mentioned that
he intended to name his book Ormus. Here is a quote from his Global
Sciences lecture:
"There is a book being written on
it, it will be out in about 8 to 9 months also. It will be called
ORMUS, it will be in all bookstores, we are not sure it will be
published by one of the big publishing houses, if not, we will publish
it ourselves. It will be a biography, it will be the story of my
life and my quest for the Holy Grail and the acquisition of it."
It is also clear that Hudson was applying the term ORME to the natural
form of these elements. This is particularly evident in his patents
where he actually tried to patent the natural ORME form of these
elements:
"More particularly, this invention
relates to the separation of the aforesaid transition and noble metal
elements from naturally occurring materials in their orbitally
rearranged monoatomic forms, and to the preparation of the aforesaid
transition and noble metal elements in their orbitally rearranged
monoatomic forms from their commercial metallic forms."
Later in his patent he specifically states that the ORMEs have a
natural form:
"During efforts to effect
quantitative analytical separations of transition metals from naturally
occurring materials, it was discovered that ORMEs exist naturally and
are found in salts with alkali metals and/or alkaline earth metals, all
of which are coupled with waters of hydration and normally found with
silica and alumina."
"ORMEs exist naturally" is a very unambiguous statement.
This is stated again later in the patent:
"The ORMEs of this invention exist
in nature in an unpure form in various materials, such as sodic
plagioclase or calcidic plagioclase ores. Because of their
non-metallic, orbitally rearranged monoatomic form, ORMEs are not
detected in these ores as the corresponding "metals" using conventional
analysis and, accordingly, until the present invention were not
detected, isolated or separated in a pure or substantially pure
form. Their presence in the nonmetallic form explains the
inconsistent analysis at times obtained when analyzing ores for metals
whereby the quantitative analysis of elements accounts for less than
100% of the ore by weight."
While I was researching this article, I spoke with one of Hudson's
chemists. I asked him what term David Hudson uses to refer to these
elements in their natural form and his answer was "ORMEs".
There is even a hint that David Hudson thinks that the Essene's Sodium
Burn method is a good method for obtaining ORMEs. Ron Talmage wrote the
following after a talk with David Hudson:
"David stated that 'the sodium
burn method was on the right track' David also stated that the big
problem with this method was the contaminates [sic] generated by the
containers used in the sodium burn method. David stated that the
originator of the Sodium Burn method was a very astute person, but that
that individual had not worked for him."
David Hudson was referring to the gentleman that we call the Essene. I
learned how to make the white precipitate from the Essene on May 18,
1997. He called all of the white precipitates from various sources
"m-state". These sources included the white precipitate from the Wet
Method on ocean water or Dead Sea salt and the white precipitate from
the Sodium Burn on metallic gold and black sand. He also referred to
David Hudson's products as m-state and, when I told him of the
substances that Jim made from metal using ozone we both spoke of these
substances as being m-state materials. The Essene also applied this
term to these elements in their natural forms; i.e. in rock and ocean
water. Since he coined the term "m-state" I think that it is reasonable
to accept his usage of the term.
Whatever generic terms we apply to these substances may also have to
apply to the "oil" form as described by Jim, Kevin, Gary H. and David
Hudson.
In his patent, David Hudson made a distinction between ORMEs and
S-ORMEs. He claimed that the ORMEs existed in nature and tried to
patent them. The S-ORMEs, according to Hudson's patent, were a refined
form of the ORMEs which were capable of certain superconductive
behaviors.
Jim based his magnetic trap on the theory that S-ORMEs also exist in
nature and that all one has to do is to bump up their energy levels a
bit by spinning them in a magnetic field and they will exhibit
superconductive behaviors like levitation.
In early November of 2003 I had the opportunity to visit with a
scientist, named Kevin, in Australia. Kevin discovered that it is
possible to extract the oil of the precious elements from bore (well)
water and from the air using diethyl ether on magnetic trap product.
The simplest explanation for this phenomenon is that S-ORMEs do, in
fact, exist in nature as Jim predicted when he built his first traps.
Kevin once wrote:
"David Hudson's interpretation
disallows by omission the thousands of alchemists experiences and
writings over the last 2500 years, who refer to the Peter Pan like
Mercury [life force or chi] in the air as the centerpiece of the
praxis. I would ask anyone following this thread to not be hoodwinked
into thinking that the DH interpretation of the Philosopher's Stone
says it all. It falls far short. Again, I say the precipitate family
has interesting properties. It may be a good starting point in the
evolutionary bit, not an end."
In his 1999 Dallas lecture David Hudson gives a fairly good description
of his first encounter with the substances he was later to name ORMEs.
In this story he tells about how he placed activated charcoal in the
water from a volcanic hot spring and was able to get a bead of the
precious metal elements when he had these charcoal pieces fire assayed.
In another lecture, Hudson describes the loaded charcoal as being full
of an oily substance. Jim also noticed an oily (Jim called it "snotty")
substance in his charcoal briquettes. Like David Hudson, Jim claims
that he has taken bits of water soaked charcoal and extracted metallic
gold from them. I heard Jim talk about this in 1989, six years before
either of us heard of David Hudson.
During one of my early visits with the Essene, he spoke of how he had
taken a natural source of m-state iridium and made a levitating disk
from it. This would also suggest that his use of the term "m-state"
included the superconducting form that Hudson called S-ORMEs. The
Essene never demonstrated this to me so I cannot confirm it from my own
experience. Of course David Hudson has not demonstrated his levitating
material to us either. I guess we just have to take their word for this
claim.
Jim is the only person I know who has demonstrated the levitation of
ORMUS gold to me. I had some of this in my possession for over a year
and was able to demonstrate it to dozens of people. I also was able to
videotape the demonstration so it could be shared with everyone.
Just prior to my first visit with the Essene we set up a "private"
email list to evaluate and promote various ORMUS production methods.
The folks on this list (about 60 people) agreed to the following
wording of the ORMUS method document after nearly a year of
experimentation and discussion:
"Since Hudson has patented his
process for obtaining and identifying these elements, we would like to
suggest that the terms ORMUS and m-state be used when referring to this
state of matter."
It was our intention to honor Hudson by using his term "ORMUS(R) and to
honor the Essene by using his term "M-State". Both of these terms were
originally used to cover all of these elements as they occur in a
non-metallic form in nature.
The first person to suggest that Hudson's materials might not be
monatomic is a gentleman who wished to be known only as Gary. Gary, who
died in 1998, worked for a very large aerospace corporation and
described his scientific background thus: "I have a background in
physics, electronics, and know a few things about chemistry and the
elements."
You can read what Gary had to say on this subject at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/ozone.htm
and at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/research/paranorm.htm
Another scientist, a professional chemist, who also did not wish to be
identified, wrote the following:
"I agree that D.H. deserves credit
for discovering this material, but we should use terms that describe
what we really have to avoid confusion in the future. What we are
really working with here are valence coupled diatomic elements, so they
should be called something along that line so that people do not try to
visualize a nonexistent monatomic structure. ORME was very
misleading to me and I[f] Gary hadn't pointed out that they are
actually diatomic, I could have never passed go. In this regard,
I think Gary deserves just as much credit as Hudson."
This gentleman was quite insistent that we not use the acronym "ORME"
in describing these materials but was okay with using the terms
"m-state" and "ORMUS(R) .
For these and other reasons we rejected the use of the acronym ORME
(which stands for Orbitally Re-arranged Monoatomic Element) since David
Hudson and his scientific consultants have not provided any conclusive
scientific evidence, that these materials are orbitally re-arranged or
monatomic, to the public.
Of course this does not prevent Hudson and others from using terms like
"G-ORME" or "S-ORME" to refer to specific forms of the ORMUS elements.
It also does not prevent the Essene from using specific terms to refer
to things like m-iridium, M-1, M-3 or C-11. In fact, I am sure that a
lot of new terms will be coined to refer to specific forms of the ORMUS
materials.
While we have not seen any clear evidence that these materials are
monatomic, diatomic or something else we still need some way to
distinguish them from their metallic form. I do think that there is
enough accumulated evidence to say that these elements in the ORMUS
form do not respond to most types of spectroscopic analysis in the same
way as they do in their metallic form. If there is a single defining
physical property for the ORMUS elements it would have to be this
spectroscopic ambiguity. It sometimes even looks like
they are something else when they are assayed spectroscopically.
Some of the best work we have in the area of spectroscopic analysis is
the work that August did. August compared the x-ray fluorescence of
metallic gold, m-state gold made using the sodium burn, Dry Method
precipitate and ocean water precipitate.
You can see August's XRF workup on Wet Method precipitate at:
X-Ray Fluorescence on M-3 Source Sand, M-3 and
Sea Water Precipitate by August
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/XRFM3Sea.htm
In his conclusion on that page August states:
"Analysis of Ocean ppt monatomic
content:
Strong likelihood of monatomic gold. Expected blunted spectral
line in the correct position."
August's work suggests that these substances exist in nature and are
not spectroscopically visible in the expected way.
In summary, it appears that there is a class of materials which do not
show up in regular spectroscopic assay. David Hudson called these
materials ORME which suggests that they are monatomic and the Essene
called them m-state which also suggests that they are monatomic. The
scientists that I mentioned above and other scientists and lay people
agreed that we should not try to impose Hudson's way of thinking on the
world by using the acronym for Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements
when David Hudson himself never provided any scientific evidence that
these elements were monatomic. We decided to honor David Hudson by
using a term that he suggested, "ORMUS(R) and to use the Essene's term
"m-state" (which could stand for "manna state" as easily as monatomic
state) when referring to these materials in a generic way.
This site reproduced with permission of Barry Carter
Sponsored by ORMUS(R) Institute of Natural Science & Metaphysics LLC
--The ORMUS(R) Coop has no affiliation with Barry Carter whatsoever, nor with any of the producers
listed on his various forums or websites.--This information is provided for educational purposes only.
NO indorsement express of implied is made as to accuracy of information presented by other producers or
manufactures or growers.